Coherence Justification and Knowledge: The Current Debate. - I. Abstracts of Contributed Essays. - II. Focus: The Work of Keith Lehrer. - 1. Lehrer's Coherentism and the Isolation Objection. - 2. Personal Coherence Objectivity and Reliability. - 3. Fundamental Troubles With the Coherence Theory. - 4. Lehrer's Coherence Theory of Knowledge. - 5. How Reasonable is Lehrer's Coherence Theory? Beats Me. - 6. When Can What You Don't Know Hurt You?. - III. Focus: Laurence Bonjour's The Structure of Empirical Knowledge. - 1. BonJour's The Structure of Empirical Knowledge. - 2. BonJour's Coherence Theory of Justification. - 3. BonJour's Coherentism. - 4. Circularity Non-Linear Justification and Holistic Coherentism. - 5. Coherentist Theories of Knowledge Don't Apply to Enough Outside of Science and Don't Give the Right Results When Applied to Science. - 6. The St. Elizabethan World. - 7. Coherence Observation and the Justification of Empirical Belief. - 8. Epistemic Priority and Coherence. - 9. BonJour's Anti-Foundationalist Argument. - 10. Foundations. - IV. Focus: Coherence and Related Epistemic Concerns. - 1. The Unattainability of Coherence. - 2. Epistemically Justified Opinion. - 3. The Multiple Faces of Knowing: The Hierarchies of Epistemic Species. - 4. Equilibrium in Coherence?. - V. Coherentists Respond. - 1. Coherence and the Truth Connection: A Reply to My Critics. - 2. Replies and Clarifications. Language: English