Rethinking the Politics of Absurdity

What does it mean to describe something or someone as absurd? Why did absurd philosophy and literature become so popular amidst the violent conflicts and terrors of the mid- to late-twentieth century? Is it possible to understand absurdity not as a feature of events but as a psychological posture or stance? If so what are the objectives dynamics and repercussions of the absurd stance? And in what ways has the absurd stance continued to shape postmodern thought and contemporary culture? In Rethinking the Politics of Absurdity Matthew H. Bowker offers a surprising account of absurdity as a widespread endeavor to make parts of our experience meaningless. In the last century he argues fears about subjectsâ destructive desires have combined with fears about rationality in a way that has made the absurd stance seem attractive. Drawing upon diverse sources from philosophy literature politics psychoanalysis theology and contemporary culture Bowker identifies the absurd effort to make aspects of our histories our selves and our public projects meaningless with postmodern revolts against reason and subjectivity. Weaving together analyses of the work of Albert Camus Georges Bataille Judith Butler Emmanuel Levinas and others with interview data and popular narratives of apocalypse and survival Bowker shows that the absurd stance and the postmodern revolt invite a kind of bargain in which meaning is sacrificed in exchange for the survival of innocence. Bowker asks us to consider that the very premise of this bargain is false: that ethical subjects and healthy communities cannot be created in absurdity. Instead we must make meaningful even the most shocking losses terrors and destructive powers with which we live. Bowker's book will be of interest to scholars and practitioners in the fields of political science philosophy literature psychoanalysis sociology and cultural studies. . Language: English